The Chimes

Professors discuss social justice in light of the Gospel

Faculty members attempt to model healthy disagreements for students.

Back to Article
Back to Article

Professors discuss social justice in light of the Gospel

Jessica Brest, Freelance Writer

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.

Email This Story

Sociology professor Brad Christerson and biblical and theological studies professor Thaddeus Williams publicly discussed their differing viewpoints on how Christians should approach social justice in light of the Gospel on Oct. 3.

President Barry Corey started these Duologues in the spring semester of 2018, making this semester the second installment. Speakers, drawn from faculty members, have promoted the initiative as a way to teach students how to have healthy and productive discussions about issues they disagree on by speaking about some of these topics on stage.


The first portion of the Duologue kick-started Wednesday morning in Chase Gymnasium during an All Community Chapel where Christerson and Williams each presented their main arguments in ten-minute TED Talk-like segments. The moderators, communication studies professor Tim Muehlhoff and biblical and theological studies professor Richard Langer, introduced the Duologue by reminding students of its purpose—to model a conversation that helps individuals understand differing opinions and identify common core convictions, rather than change the other person’s mind.

“When people see our disagreements, they better see something different,” Muehlhoff said.

Christerson and Williams hope that students will learn to retain their diverse opinions while recognizing their shared core faith.

“We can disagree about things and learn from each other while both having the same goal to serve Jesus to the best of our abilities. That unity allows us to disagree about things,” Christerson said.

Students expressed gratitude for the efforts of Biola’s faculty in addressing these hard topics. Senior kinesiology major Bailey McGeough felt Christerson, Williams and the moderators directed the conversation well and hopefully set a good example for future discussions.

“I am very surprised that Biola held a discussion like this, but I’m very happy that it was had. I thought it was really nice that, when it got too intense, they refocused the conversation to keep it civil. They were trying to listen to each other and respond back,” Bailey said.

The discussion continued that evening in Calvary Chapel, where the professors were finally able to respond to each other’s points. The conversation was facilitated by Muehlhoff and Langer who came prepared with questions, but later, the panel was opened to the audience for Q&A.


Williams’ main point was, “Contend for the faith that was once for all and entrusted to the saints.” Williams grew up exposed to inequalities through traveling and formed a sense of injustice early in life because of it. He explained that the more he studied theology, the more he understood how precious the Gospel is and that we need to be careful not to lose the Gospel in favor of social justice in the 21st century.

In response, Christerson described his position, saying, “Our faith in Jesus compels us to seek justice, and that includes reforming systems that are unjust.”

He described how growing up in a middle-class community in Colorado left him unaware of the privileges he had and of how different others’ experiences were from his own. It took a non-Christian sociology professor in college to open his eyes to the suffering in this world and force him to ask, “What does God say to do in this broken world?”

Both professors emphasized the importance of pursuing a biblical understanding of justice that allows for the freedom to act with confidence and love.

“The Gospel matters. Justice matters. And we need to think biblically about both because there is just way too much at stake,” Williams said.

When the event ended, students and faculty, including Williams and Christerson, gave a roaring applause and immediately discussed opinions among one another.

“I came tonight to hear both perspectives—which was so limited. There are so many perspectives of oppression because everyone has been dehumanized at some point,” said senior business major Tinisee Kandakai. “I think it’s a huge reminder that we’re going to offend one another because offense comes on an individual level, but I’m glad that we’re making efforts to shine light on this issue because it’s a very real thing.”


Leave a Reply

4 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of

It struck me as non-biblical for Dr. Christerson to say during the morning chapel that Jesus came for 3 reasons (saving sinners, building a loving community, and justice). While the first is correct, it incorrectly elevated other motives that were by-products of Jesus’ single-minded, self-stated purpose (“For the Son of Man came to seek and save the lost.” – Luke 19:10).

Maurice E Pinzón

Professors discussed “social justice” in light of the Gospel. Here is what they failed to discuss: that “social justice” and the Gospel are mutually exclusive. This is plain to anyone who has the Holy Spirit. The Scriptures rail against those who try to bring about righteousness through wrath (James 1:20), as the social justice warriors are wont to do (try wearing a MAGA cap to BIOLA). In fact, Christians are so naive, especially the greater part of the BIOLA student body, that they have allowed political liberals and social justice warriors to weaponize the Gospel against us. By confusing spiritually… Read more »

Mike Holler

Mike Holler

Mike Holler

Maurice and KSW have made perfectly legitimate points. Let me add that we all long for justice and that the church should always model justice and seek justice. The term “social justice” is different; it sounds harmless, but has a hidden meaning. It is in fact one tool of the Socialists to create an all-powerful government. It means that the government(s) will be empowered to compel an equal economic outcome for all. It disguises this purpose, pursuing equal outcome in stages, but the end game is no longer even a secret to those who will inquire. Our State and federal… Read more »

Navigate Left
  • Professors discuss social justice in light of the Gospel


    Biola global leaders’ say their last hurrah

  • Professors discuss social justice in light of the Gospel


    Removal of art student’s pentagram stirs up controversy on campus

  • Professors discuss social justice in light of the Gospel


    Health Center provides resources for students in case of measles infection

  • Professors discuss social justice in light of the Gospel


    School of Science, Technology and Health says farewell to dean Paul Ferguson

  • Professors discuss social justice in light of the Gospel


    “Newcomers to Neighbors” starts conversation about Middle Eastern migrants

Navigate Right
The Student News Site of Biola University
Professors discuss social justice in light of the Gospel